Lecture2Go-Wartungsarbeiten am 30.9.2021

Aufgrund dringender Wartungsarbeiten steht Lecture2Go leider am 30.09.2021 von 9:00 bis 21:00 Uhr nur eingeschränkt zur Verfügung. Mit zeitweiligen Ausfällen ist zu rechnen, Logins und Uploads sind während der Wartungsarbeiten nicht möglich. Wir versuchen, den tatsächlichen Ausfall in diesem Zeitraum so kurz wie möglich zu halten, und bitten die Unterbrechung zu entschuldigen.

Ihr Lecture2Go-Team im RRZ

Video Catalog

Views: 662

How (not) to analyse Number-Sentences



Pairs of Number- and Count-Sentences like (1) 'The number of Martian moons is two' and (2) 'Mars has two moons' give rise to the following puzzle. How can such pairs be obviously equivalent given that, according to Frege's influential analysis, the truth of Number-Sentences does whereas, according to linguistic theory, the truth of Count-Sentences does not require the existence of numbers? Proponents of the Deflationary Compositional Strategy seek to resolve this puzzle by arguing, contra Frege, that on their correct linguistic analysis the truth of Number-Sentences does not require the existence of numbers. In this talk, I pursue two main goals. First, I indicate that (and why) recent attempts, due to Friederike Moltmann and Katharina Felka, to vindicate this strategy by analysing Number-Sentences as so-called specificational sentences are unsatisfactory. Second, I propose an alternative, more promising analysis which is based on a novel interpretation of terms like 'the number of Martian moons', according to which they can function as higher-order definite descriptions.

This video may be embedded in other websites. You must copy the embeding code and paste it in the desired location in the HTML text of a Web page. Please always include the source and point it to lecture2go!



Social Media