Okay, dann hallo, everyone. So, from
Brisbinesstralia. And so, but do that give you little
be to the context or in which we've done this.
So in Australia, the astralian government, actually support
say penaccess. And both of our research funding bodys,
the astralian new search council on the national health and medical research council,
both half open access mondates, and have hard to elve the 50 years.
So, there's a very supportive environment. Institutionally,
there's also say, are strong support for epen access it
my university,
quins and you
investive technology
Where fully large Institution, all the mainly undergradudes,
but we have around about 1300 research aktive stuff.
All we products around 4.000 here reviewed, publications, it's great.
Importantly, we are the home of precise of commons
lecencing in Australia. And we have a large research group
of legal researchers working in the creature common space.
Oh, we are very, I say,
very strongly, it supportive a value pan access.
We enjoyst the first open access policy in the world,
buck in
I we now have 48.000 epen-access, articles in our repository.
And last year we celebrated our 25 million downlight.
I had a big celebration. It's good. Now the previous policy,
recorded that stuff to positive the excepted money script,
of all of that peer reviewt, articles,
or general articles empire of your conference papers.
And also they high to great these see.
So a PHD and must this by research these sees,
have been made epen-access sense
And the compliance, rates are really high. So one other rich,
about 70% of our akademics, give us the appropriate vision.
Oh just say, they give us a money
script vision. To be honest we not show with it's
see the submitted all the accepted in some cases,
but it's not the published vision.
Are there all disciplinary differences, are some facultesar,
more compliant and others? So what was the russional for
the change? Well, that is that open access definitions,
now in cloud,
are reuse
In making our articles, freely evaluable, with autolicence,
they are free surreal, but not necessarily are penaccess.
So we decided that, why we needed to do something.
And say the revised policy, a search that,
we will be pushing a creative commons license,
also all of the accepted manuscripts, and on the digital thesis.
So we childs the most and the list liberal license,
for that these says. So the crazy commons attribution non-commercial nature rereasive.
Because we felt we out the studium suducy of care.
So they wouldn't find to chapter from they theseles, republished in a journal somewhere.
But the accepted money scripts were putting a atribution on commercial lessons.
Now the legal on dependings rust diving this,
is that we have an IP-Populicy,
that says that the University and the copyright and scolarly articles.
And gives the all this,
the right to signer rain publishing agreements,
but subject to the University retaining on a reravocoople,
known exclusive license,
to make the archical
evaluable to use the eprints
The prove a pricess to a long time,
my hot to win over the library leadership,
the assistant deans of research and also that appearsy
vice chance lot. Before preceeding through the formal commissions to
gets to policy and doors. And it was in
doors to by universed the akademic board in September.
How are the implementation is going to be staged?
We are mediately started pushing the occrash of commons lessons is on the the these is,
but initially, we're any pushing the crash of commons lessons on accept money scripts,
where all of the others are from QRT.
Wether are external others, where in currigin the or this
to have a conversation, with the external payrol this.
So we'll move into varshave of the next told of months.
And we have a program of going out to the faculties
and talking to the academics about the change in the policy.
So they understand, what's happened. And this is
where I've try to keep it that the minimal conversation,
we purred down to, why we've done it?
What they need to do, I much we will do
For them, all we says,
we ask you to keep a copy of your accepted manuscript,
I mean, ask you to give it to us.
I'm wealty the rest. So we will appliany in Balgas,
leasure required, we will monage all the copyright,
we will curright the record underprise that to license.
All you have to do is give us the file.
And we gave them, just six things to remember.
The dapen access five our repositives, easy, it's leader,
we want to is a keep a copy of the monuel script,
you don't have to pay for epon acccess.
So if you have a nape an access policy,
if got to priorith mit dem Fanta, du kannst mit ihr halb arbeiten.
Und das wird in Australien Repository basiert, die Repenacts,
das ist das perfekte Model. If a good day,
pen access. Und wir haben das Supple year.
So, das war all message. I'm say,
I've been gothering some days to say, if it's making a different. So,
I compact the six months, October,
to my in 280, to the sign in this year,
and refounded the the this proportion of CC elicensed,
epen access aretems, when top from 40-30%,
60-8%.
So, we finites actually having A difference. And say,
the takime messages, that the IWI definition,
house been changed, and the boss been raised to in play to license.
And there's a playing a cC license to these is.
It's at you good thing. It's specified the limits of
what people can do with this. And so this reassures,
the these these this is all this, that these is what be messiales.
And the this worth while investigation, whether are not this is possible.
And we're is possible, it means that too are providing
people with an alternative pain for rapen access.
At said.
Thank you