name is then, you scarling hon, and yes,
I'm here, ups something, show miss University of Technology.
I mainly going to give you some souls and insights in
the development of the service you, see some
screenshots of up here. The not so humble,
title of the talkies, how to bilar repository,
relevant for your institution, but the main thing is,
that we want to to allow the researchers to do research
raw the then administration,
that was one of our main motivators
It is also the story of why we chose to develop
our Chris or repository in house from scratch.
Sam Garnian, touch about that's why we did it,
how we went about it,
that we have a strong focus on the users perspectives of what we did.
I will lose it talking little but our roles in
the development teams and our main
modefized vote remotivators and driving forces
We have to go back in time. So all we
can go to this time to start with we released this
repositories that research information systems, it contains posts,
publications and projects.
It was released last year in Generary. Yes, not
this year, last year. So it's pretty new.
But we now will have to go back in time.
So we are five years. But the management at are used university,
wanted to us to build service for showing research projects online.
We all ready had publication apositories, since 2004, 3 something.
So we got this tasking, this was mainly the tosk,
we were given. We didn't get a long list of demands.
I was not in the team at that points so,
but I have colleagues here that can feel out the information if I miss.
Something from this time. A team was spute together,
trying to deal with this tosk
Team of Viewex Experts, Librarians and Systems developers.
We had agile management at library. So we started working with the
scrum with Sprints. We didn't make a three year plan,
we had we got three years, but we didn't make a three years fan.
But we want to do just do one thing at time.
And talk to our uses, offen. The team gross
a beat the scribe as this, three rooms, developers, they wanted to to build the thing rights, we had a scrum amaster,
someone facilitizing our team efforts,
who want to to make sure with did things in a effective way,
so we wanted to us to build a thing fast,
and my roll, it's a very roll peacher,
but I'm up there,
I'd was the product one or in this team,
which ments, I had to be a lione a stay counders,
do the priorituations, together with the team,
but I want to then,
as it's said,
a build
a thing right
So, we looked ats the softwares eventual five years to
go and we didn't really find only thing that suched are needs.
Specially, when we started to talk to our stakeholders
and users, we realized that we wanted something else.
Mainly, I mean, the systems listed here,
you shouldn't pay to much a tension to it.
They were in early days that didn't have some of them
were in early days others felt quite nicht an das Feld
oldern und nicht on other things than we need it.
So we in the end got to the conclusion,
that we should do this are selfs. So,
part of the imput from the stakeholders, I'm going to go
through quite a lot of the imput from the stakeholders.
And that is to give you like an overview of how much
how many perspectives there are. This count be seen,
this is an example method of user imputs and effect mag. Also du kannst sehen,
ich denke, ich will just that it show like this,
maybe it's better here, aber was it means is,
that we went talk in charge stakeholders,
getting the imputs on their goals,
would using our systems.
Und of course, who they workers,
we then had to pin point our privatize users.
And then what they wanted us to do. So,
looking at the executive this, the management,
they want to to have access to good data,
they want to to use
that this addressuresments for the institution
They want to be visualized, as to show,
how we worked internationally and how the cooperations looks all over the University.
So that's one perspective. We also talked to ourselves.
I'm a librarian. It's it was a different perspective.
It's we were quite publications, orient it. We were a very
kind on integrating with the systems, that we were worked with,
like we had it nice integration with our kid.
And we want to to work more with that.
So that was important. We was a hard a
alte metrics with intreally know, what to to do
with out metrics
Or we didn't know what to do it that,
but we didn't want sure how to use it.
So that maybe that new repository, was a way to use old metrics.
And of course, you want to be interrupt probably we
all kinds of systems. And from an librains perspective,
we also addit outpack and it did's going system,
on top of the rest of the web world.
And we want to to have the librains,
we want to to have advanced search interfaces.
So we could do are good job.
The researchers didn't really care, much about this.
They back up the matter of manuagement saying,
they want to to have a visualization of what they did.
They want to us to say there time.
They also want to us to help them see their impact.
In this open system, not only from the bibliometric
reports, but also in this system.
And they want to us to integrate the system with with Google Scollar,
Research Goat, the stuff like that. So,
if I'm a administrative perspective or the administration perspective,
so, the we searchers requiet Nice with chelling us,
that we like the system, it will be very years full,
but I shouldn't at the Dates are.
I think. The library management also want to us to
make sure we free the stuff, a bit from the old systems,
lot of book with the long forms, so stuff like that.
And then we have the matritions, the scientomaticians,
saying that if your data, is not perfect,
we probably volt use it.
So, was there are a system for
all these needs
Not that time, there still is no one.
And what we did then was that we started building everything
from squatch? So you can at any point,
check, the service at research to showners that today.
This is a road mob, muff of how you went.
And all you see, it's a blue sky and bush of flys.
But that I can read is that in 20215,
we did the release of the data base with projects
With the collaborations, between organizations in the University.
We strong focus on showing persons as well. In 2016,
we were to lot with the visualizing or data.
It was very pretty not. Sometimes not always very useful,
but very pretty. So people like it others did not.
And in 201000 17, we shifted the focus to or special publications.
Amy not closing down or old repository. And we start to
with the doctoral teasis,cause that was a workflow,
we cracy that we can make it up a good Change in.
And then internary this year, last year, we release the system.
I was gibt the slides that know and can see cause
it's you can look at at some other time.
I think this is even though it more text,
it's maybe is bachard
How should do that how should be adding the data,
how did we deal with these sneeds?
So we set up important of complications, both from Scope is and webble science.
We had we made sure that if the authors ordered IoSBNs
from the library when they came back the next time,
it would be pre-film with the,
it would be pre-film with the data,
we were ready have there name,
there affiliation and assumptions like they right in English and it's courvish and this year.
So they don't tust to do everything from
start and that was specifically developed for their doctoral students
We also found a little tool for also matic klassification,
based on the upstracts, and that is a subject terminology
or anthology that is used in suitem.
So we used that one and then just got the articles
of stuff plastified automatically, which was one of the things
that people didn't to like to do.
Not librarians and need
that researchers
And of course, we trade to get the projects important from Somewhere.
So we used a data-based a local data-based.
And also from Porris und the Swedish Chris Systems initially.
And we trade to get some miss Person Data from
Orkid, which we also did. And of course,
Data is then visualized or usued in a lot of
other systems
So freeing a ministrators, they also get the benefits
of all the other parts of hours.
But we really try to have instituce interfaces. And some
nice tools for merging stuff. And then maybe the hardest
part was to actually make sury had less materator fields,
then in the old system.
Yes. So how did you the users reacts?
So I'm not to selling this system,
but I've just in the
positive once
Before in the old system, we had a researcher,
that we like talk about a lot, the person,
who say to say the day and word hurrica leaks,
before adding this years publications.
So should did it once the year, just,
you know, you have mit them, I guess.
So that we trying to think that this person should have any your life. As one points,
we got comment that research was the first administrative system at the University,
which was fun to use, we are then completing with the systems,
where you do travel expensives, like that.
So, it's not really, yeah, it's not.
It's not like we are competeing with other fun systems,
but that was a good thing to here.
Of course, we have the data. So,
it is a goal mind. And for one of comments also
was that it was a lead forward in Usability.
So, I have to slide swaite our lessons learned.
So, one thing was that we are low
the developers to choose that technology themselves.
We didn't take there from
the outside
We talk to the you serves offen. We didn't do long planning,
we try to assult, what was at hand.
And create for value for the uses,
now like doing this small, iterative process.
And we also said, that we want to there to
fail. So we didn't to like big really says,
where the small releases,
which stuff that we could then
go back and do again
Propert to adapt, quickly to changes, since to world
is moving fast. We are now that. But it's also
good to keep in mind, when you do development,
that's also one motivator for not taking to big steps.
Try all your hypertothy is with the real users.
And the reprimations, you have that willkommen to you as
astue developy learn as you, as you go a long.
And also, you has realized that every busy researchers,
still seems to have 15 minutes over for meeting,
when ask mysley,
maybe with coffee or something
Und dachte,
was die End of my small gespot.
Thank you